Sunday, 7 February 2016

Analyse the visual style (cinematography, editing, mise-en-scène) in The Red Shoes. How does the visual style assist our understanding of the film’s themes and narrative concerns?

The Red Shoes (1948) was originally a fairy-tale by Hans Christian Anderson, and although it was adapted into a film by The Archers Powell and Pressburger, many of the same themes still exist, such as the girl’s desires to dance. The mental state of Vicky Page, played by Moira Shearer, is explored extensively in the Ballet of The Res Shoes, the colour red is referenced to throughout, and the desperation to succeed is something that has transpired from the original fairy-tale as well. The narrative concerns this essay will focus on are the instability of Vicky’s mind explored through the scene in which she dances the ballet of The Red Shoes.  It will also look at how the visual style assists the audience’s expectations of the film from the opening sequence and the first scene. This particular film has been chosen due to its plenitude of exploitation of visual style to support and influence the audiences understanding of the film’s narrative concerns and themes.

The mise-en-scène translates from the French as ‘staging’ or ‘putting into the scene’ and thus has its provenance in theatre rather than cinema1. However, fairy-tales are often adapted for film due to their dramatic nature and accessibility for all ages. The fairy-tale origins of The Red Shoes is alluded to from the very beginning, with the film opening with an extreme close-up of an atmospheric flickering candle, then zooming out to show a book with ‘Hans Christian Anderson’ written on the spine in ornate gold lettering. The candle sits on the book, with a white-feathered quill on one side and a charcoal black inkpot on the other side. Behind, a piece of tattered, aged parchment nailed to the wall, reads “The Red Shoes”, written in bold, blood red paint. In front of the book sits two small, bright red ballet point shoes, the ribbons frozen in curls out to the side horizontally.
The mise-en-scène of this shot, which takes up less than a minute, visually heralds to the origins of the film and gives us an insight into what the film will be about. According to James Monaco, mise-en-scène is the filmmaker’s tool, which ‘alters and modifies our reading of the shot’2. So the red of the writing and shoes being representative of love, passion and anger was carefully picked by Powell and Pressburger to introduce a motif that will be engrained into the audiences subconscious from the very beginning. The shoes themselves being fairly self-explanatory as a symbol of ballet, poise and elegance let the audience know that they will be important, and as the opening credits show, they are concentrated on more as the introduction continues. The camera technique of extreme-close up zooming out to the view of the whole frame gives a gradual exposition of the fairy-tale idea of the film. The use of a candle as lighting gives the piece an aged feeling as it flickers on the archaic parchment and quill, however the candle is not really the source of light, it is in fact full front lighting which washes out the objects, giving them equal importance.

The animated backgrounds of the opening credits support the fairy-tale ideal, with the red ballet shoes in a fixed position in the centre while the backdrops change. The flowers and sunrise images juxtaposed with the flames and dark trees show the different periods in which the tale has been told, as though it has been adapted in many ways since it’s original creation.
The saturated use of primary colours accentuate the affect of the mood changes, giving the opening a dream like quality, colour adding ‘an entirely new dimension’2. The fantastical feel to the animated opening is encouraged by the major orchestral music, adding to the feel of thematic continuity.

Cinematography depends largely on how the filmmaker transforms perspective3. In the next shot, perspective is played upon to give the audience an understanding of where the scene is set and the status of the characters in the shot.
The first shot of the actual film is from a low angle short lens shot of a staircase and the audience are immediately brought into the action by the sound of crowds shouting. If we are to take into consideration what Bernard F. Dick suggest, that sound is an integral element of mise-en-scène 4, then as the first noise made by actors in the film, this shouting is important to the film, and assists the intrigue created by the low lighting, lack of physical actor presence and the open form of the shot, exposed by the first actor walking into the frame. The plastics of this shot include off-white and green walls with a dusty window lit from the outside and a wall lamp giving off minimal yellow light. From this, the audience become interested in where the scene is being shot, and expectant of a performance once the character in tails appears.
 When the first actor enters the shot, as he is being lit from behind, his shadow is thrown onto the wall making him seem larger, the perspective relations3 meaning that the characters shadow seems larger than normal because of the back light. This gives the impression of importance and stature, supported by his formal dress of tails in comparison to the two doormen who are in grey uniform. The doormen calling him ‘Sir’ explains the status quo to the audience further as well as the shot reverse shot with the actor in tails being above the two doormen, and the fact he gives them instructions based on checking his wealth-connoting pocket watch.
As the door opens, the camera is at knee level with the actors and the student run towards it, giving as sense of a stampeding crowd. Then as the students run up the stairs, the camera following them from above, the audience notices the plain yet smart nature of their clothes. The frame then switches to a static shot of the camera slowly zooming in on the poster of The Ballet Of The Red Shoes while the students run through the corner of the camera. The next shot is of one of the doorman on the floor being trampled as students run over and passed him up the stairs, which cuts to the students ripping the poster as they run pass.
The editing of this sequence is sharp and fast, reflecting the sense of urgency portrayed by the students running for seats in the theatre. The focus of the short lens encompasses all the actors at once, giving no particular student more technical advantage than another, and the lighting washes the scene with no preference. The sequence of film resulting from the montage of shots put together with calculated steadiness creates a sense of urgency, but carefully controlled. The director has chosen the closed proxemics of the stairway and put a large number of fast moving actors in it, but has balanced this with using a steady camera and full front lighting so as not to totally disorientate the audience.

The mise-en-scène of the backstage before the ballet of The Red Shoes starts is lacklustre in comparison to the front of house, the back of the set being plain board with writing on, and crowded with ballerina’s practicing individually. The lighting washes out the features of all the actors and gives no individual preferential highlighting. The set is chaotic with props scattered on the floor and the door broken. The plastics here assist the audience’s understanding of the theme of Vicky’s state of mind being chaotic because they physically show the chaos she is surrounded by. Costume can index emotional and psychological status1, and Vicky’s costume is simple, white and corseted, which shows her purity and fragility of mind. This is contrasted with her red lips, another homage to the theme of the colour red, and juxtaposed with her costume later on as it becomes ragged and dirty, insinuating she has become tarnished and worn out.

The lighting at the beginning of The Ballet of The Red Shoes is dark; the scene is from the audience’s theatrical perspective of a proscenium arch stage. As the red curtains are drawn, Grischa Ljubov played by Leonide Massine is revealed centre stage with a spotlight focused on him to begin with, followed by full stage overhead lighting. This high-key lighting gives an even diffusion to the shot, resulting in low contrast between brighter and darker areas1. The set is a large, colourful painted backdrop, which becomes clearer as the camera cuts to a close up of the scene, giving the audience the cinematic advantageous perspective of the stage. The camera and spotlight follow the subject as he dances on stage, at which point a dissolving montage takes the ballet from the opening shot to a scene with a backdrop of a communal village setting, with a company of dancers and then focuses on Ljubov, dancing as the shoemaker, behind a glass shop front window, holding the red shoes. The montage here does not show us the entire dance; it alludes to it5, and the use of dissolving from one scene to another is a cinematic privilege that assists our understanding of Vicky’s mind as the time is moving quickly and seamlessly.
It is apparent that the shoes, which are lit by a spot light, are meant for Vicky when she comes to the window and see’s a holographic vision of herself dancing in them. This is our first glimpse into Vicky’s mind, and the use of editing here to create a ghost-like image of Vicky relates to her constant desire to dance and perform. There is a subtle flashing light on the shoes when there is an extreme close up. In Western culture, we see flashing lights on emergency vehicles and in film or theatre to represent the distress of the mind or disorientation. When the shoemaker dances with the shoes in his hands, the same subtle flashing spot light is used, this warning becoming a motif. The shoes have become a prop, which have helped to pick out the character3 of Vicky. Often elements of mise-en-scène will work in patterns developed across the length of a film6. The shoes stand on point unattended, still lit by a flashing spotlight, and as Vicky jumps into them the ribbons magically do themselves up. Again this use of editing speeds up the process of the dance, reflecting how much Vicky desires the performance. At this point, Vicky is escaping into the fairy-tale origins of the ballet, shown by the magical element.

As the set starts to collapse around Vicky, the plastic sheeting with characters painted on falling to the floor, the camera focuses on Vicky’s shoes dancing on top of them, insinuating that Vicky is stepping on her co-stars to get the limelight. This could be deduced as Vicky’s view of them as material and unimportant now that she has the lead role.
The camera follows her through the chaos until Vicky is alone on stage, a low camera angle making the set seem tall and imposing, while Vicky is small in comparison. This camera angle makes Vicky seem isolated and the set being so much larger than her gives a sense of entrapment in another world. When Vicky attempts to exit through the door she initially entered through as it is opened by a maternal character with a warm yellow light spilling out, a large imposing shadow reaches for her and drags her backwards across stage. This ability of something not physical having a presence over Vicky leads us into her fractured mental state, which is supported by the extreme close up of Vicky’s sweaty face with unnaturally lurid make up, bright red lips and painted on eye-brows. You can see the physical strain the dance is having on Vicky encouraged by the key light, the effect of this being that we can clearly see Vicky’s turmoil.
The director here decides to expose Vicky’s splintered mind as he edits the silhouette of Ljubov for a brightly lit Lermontov and then replaces this with Julian. At this point we see her mental dilemma in choosing between her love for Julian Craster, played by Marius Goring, who before the performance generously said he would follow her lead, and between her dedication and respect for Lermontov, who before the performance told her the only thing that mattered was the music. Vicky’s decision is seemingly made as she runs towards the image of Julian, however the distorted perspective and Julian’s silhouette is twice the size of Vicky. Her confusion is then added to, as the camera cuts to Vicky in a fantastical empty stage with a skyline of blue and orange clouds, framed by mountains, quickly replaced by a long shot of a smoky blue wasteland. Gravitational forces seem to have been lost as Vicky jumps and remains in the air for longer than possible and then starts to fall through distorted colours.
Lermontov had asked Vicky early on in the film ‘Why do you want to dance?’ to which she replied ‘Why do I want to live?’ showing how dancing is not something she wants to do, it is something she has to do. This is translated into her psychotic state of confusion that is reflected in the setting of these fantastical worlds that she has escaped into in order to deal with the pressure of the performance. Bordwell and Thompson comment that setting is not just the container for human events but can dynamically enter the narrative action3, shown in how the deserted spaces with backgrounds of far off silhouettes of towns, or cliff edges enters the narrative action by highlighting how isolated Vicky feels in the real world by escaping to this dream world. Even though she is imagining the worlds herself, she is unable to make them happy, safe places.

Colour is an important aspect of mise-en-scène, capable of furnishing motifs that develop across the film3. The colour red was always going to be an important theme in The Red Shoes and it is no mistake that both Vicky and Julian, who fall in love, both have red hair. Vicky’s hair in particular is highlighted by the backlighting in the dance scene to make it appear flame like, possibly reflecting the passion she feels for Julian, as he is then projected, through her imagination, before her. The red ballet shoes throughout the dance scene carry this motif of colour; there are often extreme close-ups of just the shoes, which are supported by flashing red lights when there is a close up shot-reverse-shot of Vicky and Ljubov towards the end of the dance of The Red Shoes.
The colour of the film isn’t realistic, as it is painted on by Technicolor, however it isn’t supposed to be, colour is used to create meaning and subconscious theories6 so doesn’t need to be accurate. The brightness of the red brings the object closer to the audience’s attention, and we develop an association with that object. Much like the montage of attraction that is used when Vicky and two female dancers are held in the air, and then the shot is edited to dissolve into painted images of flowers, birds and finally clouds, all three being beige colours. The affect of this is to associate Vicky as a dancer to these majestic objects, but as they are all pale comparisons, we see Vicky as even more fragile.

To conclude, the visual style assists the audiences understanding of the films themes and narratives by helping follow Vicky’s thought process throughout the dance, and noticing, through the mise-en-scène, how Vicky relates to other characters in the film. The motif of the colour red contributes to the patterns of similarity, difference and development3 of our interpretation of Vicky. The camera editing shows a lot of the ballet of The Red Shoes from Vicky’s perspective, for example when we see a shot of Vicky covering her eyes with her fingers, and the next shot is from her view point as fingers uncover the lens, the audience are acutely aware of the significance of this action and how frightened Vicky as a character must be.

The mise-en-scenè, editing and cinematography of The Red Shoes allows the audience to become active, to indulge in the rich tapestry of the film underneath the surface reading. Powell and Pressburger put together their own ballet company for The Red Shoes, which adds to the verisimilitude of the film, and the use of extreme close-up shots of the actor’s faces throughout the ballet which fills the entire frame allows the audience to see in detail the affect of the action on the characters emotions. The use of shot-reverse-shot sequences in the ballet not only give a cinematic privilege to the audience but also allow scenes to be show the dramatic effects without using montage. Although when watching The Red Shoes the audience may not remember exactly how the mise-en-scène, cinematography and editing affect our interpretation, on reflection they would pick out particular scenes based mainly on what they saw, how they were shown it and how it was put together on screen. In this way, the visual style influences the audiences understanding of theme and narrative through it’s ability to subconsciously assist their grasp of the film.

Filmography:

The Red Shoes Screening Date:                   8th October
 Released:                              1948
Running Time:                      133 minutes   
Production Company:         Archers, J. Arthur Rank Films, Independent Producers       
 Production Credits: Director:                                  Michael Powell and Emeric PressburgerProducer:                                Michael Powell and Emeric PressburgerScreenplay:                             Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger, Hans AndersenCinematography:                     Jack CardiffEditor:                                      Reginald MillsMusic:                                      Brian EasdaleArt Direction:                           Arthur LawsonProduction Design:                  Hein Heckroth Cast: Boris Lermontov                      Anton WalbrookJulian Craster                          Marius GoringVictoria Page                           Moira ShearerGrischa Ljubov                        Leonide MassineIvan Boleslavsky                     Robert HelpmannIrina Boronskaja                      Ludmilla TcherinaSergei Ratov                           Albert Bassermann

In comparing and contrasting the affective presence/absence of the mother in two films, what might we conclude about Swinton as a maternal figure in cinema?

In this essay, I will be focusing on the affective presence or absence of the mother in Lynn Ramsey’s We Need To Talk About Kevin (2011) (referred to as Kevin), and Erick Zonca’s Julia (2008), where Swinton plays Eva in the former, and Julia in the latter. Initially, it is crucial for the term ‘affect to be defined as this term is notorious for pervading definition. The term affect came to prominence in A Thousand Plateaus, the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guttari, two French philosophers. Written in 1980, it referred to affect as flows and forces, also described as intangible energies, with the translator, Brian Massumi, in the foreword, describing it as “an ability to affect and be affected” (1988: xvi), which implies affect is something exchanged between two people.
Silvan Tomkins, a psychologist and personality theorist, developed affect theory a decade later by categorising affects into six, and later nine, nameable emotion pairs ranging from enjoyment-joy to anger-rage. According to Tomkins, affects “are aroused easily by factors over which the individual has little control” (Tomkins 1995: 54), implying that affects are similar to emotions, but beyond our jurisdiction. Affect can be described as a state of mind relating to an emotion, or the aura created by a situation.
The ‘affective absence’ can be the absence where generic convention has led to our expectation of its presence, so that leads the ‘affect presence’ to become where the conventional maternal ideal has been fulfilled. The psychoanalysts, philosophers and theorists I will use in the essay to explore the affect absence/presence of the maternal figure are Judith Butler, E. Ann Kaplan, Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan. These individuals work has been selected because of their focus on the development of the mother, the development of the child, and the relationship between the two.

Judith Butler is an American philosopher and gender theorist, whose work Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity strove to trouble the idea of what we perceive as the origin of gender. I intend to extend Butler’s theory to trouble the idea of the maternal, and show how it exists only within the dominant discourse of motherhood – by which I mean child-rearing books, women’s magazines and television shows and popular Hollywood films.
Kaplan is an English professor in New York, who wrote a book called Motherhood and Representation: The Mother in Popular culture and Melodrama, in which she came to two definitions of the ‘maternal melodrama’: the complicit and the resistant. The complicit maternal melodrama “represents the mother as a paternal function, and addresses a male spectator” usually featuring an “intense mother-son relationship” (1992: 69). The resistant maternal melodrama is “from the mother position and about its pleasures and oppressions” (1992: 69). These two ideas will be explored in relation to the films later in the essay.
Widely considered the father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud investigated the realms of the unconscious development of the mind based on case studies in the late 19th to early 20th century. This essay will look at the Oedipus complex, a stage of childhood development in which a male child directs his “first sexual impulse towards [his] mother and [his] first hatred and [his] first murderous wish against our father” (1899: 364). This theory is particularly relevant in regards to Kevin’s (Ezra Miller) behaviour towards his mother in Kevin.
Finally, this essay will explore some of the theory of childhood development from Jacques Lacan, a French psychoanalyst from the mid 20th century. Lacan’s work will be used to explore how the child relates to the mother in relation to their ‘want’, ‘need’, and ‘demand’ stage from his work Ecrits and The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis.

As an actress, Tilda Swinton has been described as the “supremely poised ice queen of the cinema” (Lee 2009: 1). Swinton’s acting technique embodies flat affect, often portraying characters as measured on the surface, whilst hiding the chaos beneath. The Independent describes her on screen personality as “elusive” (Romney 2008: 1), while the Guardian describes her as “cool” and “intelligent” (Cochrane 2011: 1). By asking Swinton to perform the maternal figure in Kevin and Julia, both Ramsey and Zonca are making a statement about the idea of the ‘mother’, as Swinton troubles the constructed nature of the maternal figure, to be explored and discussed further.
Although in Julia, Swinton is not the biological mother, she is the predominant female adult in the film who cares for the character Tom (Aiden Gould). I have chosen this film because of the contrast in affective presence of Swinton as a maternal figure between Eva and Julia. This essay will explore the question of maternal affect or its absence in Kevin and Julia, through which I will uncover and dissect Swinton’s performance as a maternal figure within these texts.

In 21st century Hollywood cinema, the ‘mother’ is typically a warm, reliable, responsible woman, who cares for her children selflessly. The stereotype related to the American mother in both Kevin and Julia is long hair, minimal make-up and modest clothing, as shown by the other mothers in the anti-natal class of Kevin and Elena’s (Kate del Castillo) appearance in Julia, as the biological mother of Tom. These stereotypes align the association between motherhood and femininity, subverted by Swinton’s appearance, dress and behaviour in both films. Tilda Swinton has short, cropped hair and is famed for her androgynous style, challenging the idea of what it is to be feminine. In Judith Butler’s work on gender as a performance, she writes that gender is a set of acts, created through repetitive performance, “Gender is a kind of imitation for which there is no original; in fact, it is a kind of imitation that produces the very notion of the original as an effect and consequence of the imitation itself” (1993: 310). If we are to extend this theory to motherhood, it could be argued that the ‘maternal figure’ has been created through imitation, and is not in fact the original, but the effect of motherhood.

The pressure on mothers to fulfil this role often leads to dissociation with the child, as shown by Eva in Kevin. Vivienne Welburn, in her work on postnatal depression, protested, “If we do the job adequately, it is taken for granted that it is ‘natural’ to us, if we do it badly we will be castigated by just about everyone in sight” (1980: 23). The idea that motherhood is natural to all women is troubled in both films, as Swinton’s characters take on alternative relationships with the boy’s they are the mother figure to. In Kevin especially Eva is blamed for Kevin’s actions as a result of her parenting skills, not just by the women in her town breaking her eggs in the supermarket or physically assaulting her in the street, but by herself by making an omelette with the eggs and taking the piece of shell out from between her teeth as she eats it.

Kevin begins with Eva living an idyllic lifestyle as a globetrotting travel writer, but her carefree attitude leads to pregnancy and the result is a child whose brief moments of humanity excuse him from complete evil. Effectively, Eva is shown to sacrifice her independence and her place in the public sphere in order to fulfil the stereotypical association of motherhood with the domestic/private sphere. By the end of the film, Kevin’s (Ezra Miller) actions leave her with no family, no job and no friends. Ramsey has taken the book written by Lionel Shriver and stripped it of its epistolary form; instead of a vocal narrator, the audience is shown the story with temporal disjunctions from Eva’s shell-shocked point of view, that make us question the trustworthy nature of the protagonist. The films subversion of realism uses diegetic sounds that do not fit with the images on the screen, such as the garden sprinkler sound that is repeated throughout but not shown until the end, giving the film a disoriented feeling.
The first scene of Julia shows Julia as a promiscuous barfly, the result of which leads to her losing her job, and being pressured by her sponsor to attend AA meetings, where she meets Elena, a desperate mother whose child is under his paternal grandfather’s care. Elena convinces Julia to kidnap her son with a financial incentive. When Julia realises Elena has no money, she takes Tom anyway, blackmailing the grandfather for $2 million, however her plans are ruined when she has to drive through the border wall into Mexico, and, ironically, Mexican drug dealers kidnap Tom from her. The film ends in a whirlwind of unbelievable violence and guns, where Julia has a moral turnaround in her exchange of the money for the child.

The third person perspective of Julia allows the audience to observe the choices the character makes, whilst conforming to the idea of the resistant maternal melodrama – it explores the trials of motherhood from a fresh perspective, as Julia has only just been put in charge of Tom. The affective presence of Julia as she learns to become a mother is evident in her encouraging words of “Good boy Tom”, when Tom is drying himself in the bathroom, much to both characters surprise. Julia is a character who displays no ‘nurture’ desire in the beginning of the film, stating, “I don’t know the first thing about kids”. When forced into a maternal role, however, maternal characteristics are triggered, repositioning the figure of the mother in traditional discourse. In comparison, Kevin subverts and troubles the genre of the maternal melodrama because the non-linear narrative from Eva’s disorientated hindsight does not conform to Kaplan’s definition when placed alongside the idea that Kevin was never provided with an idealized mother. By mixing the complicit and the resistant maternal melodrama, Kevin subverts the idea of what the maternal is by questioning the audience’s expectations of motherhood.

So how does Swinton’s affective presence or absence as the ‘maternal figure’ in these films subvert the conventions of the maternal melodrama, which have depended upon emotional excess, and legibility of the maternal figure? In Julia, Swinton’s affective presence as the maternal figure subverts the conventions of the maternal melodrama due to the direction in which the character Julia’s emotional excess is directed. Julia is presented as being untrustworthy, shown through her inability to keep her job due to repeated lateness. Her boss snorts in disbelief at her poor excuse of “family problems”, as the character is not the typical ‘mother’ figure in her appearance (tight dresses, over-the-top jewellery, too much make-up, heels) or behaviour (poor time-keeping, alcoholism).
However, throughout Tom’s kidnapping, Julia and Tom become so close that Eva calls herself his mother when questioned by a stranger.

In Kevin, Swinton’s affective absence subverts the conventions of the maternal melodrama through the flat affect of the character Eva, Kevin’s birth is an example of disturbing the genre. In his work on the melodramatic imagination, Peter Brooks, a professor of literature at Yale University, characterizes melodrama as an “indulgence of strong emotionalism” with “extreme states of being” (1976: 4). This is the complete opposite to the post-birth shot of Eva, who sits in a white, clinical room with bare walls and no colour, upright and expressionless as her husband Franklin (John C. Reilly) holds a bundle of blankets and coo’s into them. Kevin’s crying dominates the room, merging into the sound of a sander against concrete, a metaphor for overwhelming the eardrums and the psyche. Alongside this, we see no breast-feeding between Kevin and Eva, another example of how their relationship is unnatural from the offset, a denial of the most intimate affections between mother and child. Swinton’s pale skin almost blends into the sheets of the bed, adding to the lack her lack of presence and the unnaturalness of the situation, the blandness of the room making us aware of the absence of colour.

The colour red in Kevin occurs repeatedly, and is undoubtedly a metaphor for the horrors to come, however it could also be deduced that the colour red replaces the affective absence Swinton creates with her use of flat affect in her portrayal of Eva. She uses a red pen when trying to teach Kevin maths, which he purposely flouts by counting to fifty and demanding a stop to the lessons. Kevin turns a piece of bread with unnaturally bright red jam on it upside down on the coffee table, to which Eva glares at him, but does not chastise. Perhaps the most vivid of all is the red paint thrown at Eva’s windows. She cleans it off with the most teeth-clenching methods – razor blades on glass, an electric sander on concrete, scratchy paper on her windshield. The shots of Swinton washing the red paint from her hands are reminiscent of a historically famous woman, who was so affectively absent, she claimed she would “dash the brains” of her new born child: Lady Macbeth. Eva’s guilt in her failings to raise Kevin by society’s norms, not conforming to social scripts and regulations is evident in her eventual affective absence in her interactions with him.

Eva’s guilt is pungent throughout the film, her anxieties made clear as she sees her reflection in her sons actions, made visual through Ramsey’s clever editing of Swinton plunging her face into a sink, and Miller pulling his out. The water signifies purification as Eva tries to wash away the past, but the cuts keep taking us back in time. Kaplan wrote about Nancy Chodorow in her work Motherhood and Representation, a feminist sociologist and psychoanalyst, who theorized “the boy gets his masculine identity through precisely negating his earlier “feminine” identification with the mother” (1992: 33). In Kevin’s similar appearance to Eva’s, it could show the male child’s refusal to negate his identification with his mother.
Red wine is used by Ramsey to symbolise a desire to escape, often shown when Eva has experienced a particularly difficult situation with Kevin. Zonca also uses alcohol as a symbol for escapism, showing Julia often out of control, and then almost stupefied by her hangovers the next day. The character Julia is shown as being ruled by her pleasure principle for immediate gratification, and uses alcohol to forget about her problems. Julia admits to her friend Nick that she’s tired of her life, “I smile and I eat shit from guys, and what do I have? I don’t have anybody, I get drunk, and I’m getting old”.
Alcohol permits an escape from both characters’ lives, however also facilitates their isolation from motherhood, even if only as a temporary escape. Eva covered the walls of her study with maps of countries she had presumably been to, or wished to see, and when asked what they were for by Kevin, she said it was to show an aspect of her personality. When she leaves the room, Kevin takes a water pistol and paint, and shoots the room, ruining the maps and leaving his own mark. Upon return, Eva takes his gun and stamps on it until it breaks. In the next scene, she is shown sitting on the sofa with her feet on the coffee table, shoes covered in red paint, sipping a glass of red wine. The symbolic significance of this scene is overwhelming and has many different connotations, Film4 writer Catherine Bray describing the maps as Eva’s “lost freedom” (2011: 1), but I will explore the phallic ideology behind it. Kevin uses his water pistol, which could represent the penis, to splatter paint, which could be ejaculating and therefore a humiliation technique used on Eva, or urine to leave his scent, in order to mark the room and attempt to regain power over his mother. In this scene, Kevin is attempting to take back control by punishing Eva’s dreams of escape through the paint on the maps, ruining them. The red wine, as alcohol, signifies her need to escape the situation, making her affectively absent as a mother. Religiously, red wine symbolises strength and life, being the blood of Christ, and perhaps Eva seeks strength in order to deal with her daemon child.

Eva does not begin Kevin’s life as an affectively absent mother. In the first interaction scene with Kevin as a toddler (Rocky Duer), Swinton portrays an affectively present mother, one who tries to engage with her son by asking him “Can you say ball? B-b-b ball?” before rolling the ball towards him. By sounding out the plosives of a simple word, the character Eva is trying to pass on her knowledge to her child and help him to learn, whilst physically stimulating him with a toy. Kevin refuses to respond to Eva, staring blankly at her with a furrowed brow and allowing the ball to roll in between his legs without rolling it back. Kevin only rolls the ball back once when Eva has lost her patience, but then doesn’t respond again.
Kaplan used Freud to explain how and why children learn to speak, “children learn to use language as the means for replacing the loss of the mother” (1992: 29). Freud interprets the learning of talking as a moment when the child becomes autonomous from the mother, so this could be used to explain why Kevin refuses to talk, because he doesn’t want to let go of Eva. Kevin’s affective absence shows how the relationship needs both the mother and the child to participate in order for it to function. Kevin takes no enjoyment from playing with the toys, and does not seem to engage in activities like other children. Therefore he does not fulfil the role of the child that is essential in a mother/child dichotomy. Eva’s calm façade breaks in moments of frustration, for example when she says to him “Mommy was happy before little Kevin came along. Now Mommy wakes up every morning, and wishes she was in France”. When Kevin is incarcerated, Eva still seems to be playing the maternal role, she irons his clothes and folds them, and places them in a room he has never slept in.
The character Julia contrasts with Eva in that she does not attempt to nurture Tom, but does care for him. Julia adapts to her role as a maternal figure in Tom’s life after she kidnaps him, but in a forceful, brusque way. When they first arrive at the motel, she shoves him in the shower, makes him dry himself, and covers him in a blanket whilst he sleeps. This challenges the ideas of Stern and Stern, who wrote a book called “The Birth of the Mother: How the Motherhood Experience Changes You Forever”. This book is a self-help manual on how to be a mother, and what to expect from motherhood. In this book, they write, “you will draw on maternal instincts, developing intuitive ways of holding, touching, and making sounds that build the relationship between you and your baby” (1998: 13). Julia and Eva trouble this idea in regards to how the mother/child relationship is developed. Eva seems to lack the ‘maternal instincts’, whilst Julia develops a maternal relationship with Tom despite her lack of biological connection, and both Eva and Julia display affective absence as a mother throughout. From this we can conclude that Swinton defies the idea of the ‘maternal figure’ by presenting it as an effect of motherhood, rather than the original.

There is a battle between affective absence and presence within the character Eva when Kevin is born. She holds up the baby, who is wailing incessantly, and attempts to arrange her face in maternal ecstasy, but instead freezes in a grimace. Eva shows signs of post-natal depression after the birth. The baby cries for an unnatural amount of time, causing concern from passers by in the street. Eva stands with the buggy next to some road works so that the drilling will drown out the noise of the baby. When Franklin returns home from work, she is lying on the sofa with the curtains closed and a pained expression on her usually crease-free face. Post-natal depression symptoms include tiredness, irritability and indifference to the baby. In an interview in Welburn’s book, where sufferers of post-natal depression are interview about their illness, ‘Ann’ states “Nothing I did seemed to please the baby… I felt helpless… Every single thing that I did, he bawled his head off at, he never smiled, was never happy” (1980: 33). This is echoed in Swinton’s portrayal of a mother who feels she is unable to cope with her own child.
Eva’s pleads with Franklin to leave Kevin settled, when he returns from work. When he picks up the baby, the audience anticipate ear-piercing cries, but the expectations fall short as the child mews in comfort at the touch of his father. Franklins ability to interact with Kevin successfully question Eva’s capabilities, leading to further disconnect from both Franklin out of jealousy and Kevin out of anger. The mother’s life is taken over by the baby, as her appearance changes in order to provide for him, shown by her swollen breasts spilling out of her vest top.

The baby also takes over Eva’s life with his needs, wants and desires. In Lacan’s work on psychoanalysis, he theorizes about a child’s development in regards to their mother, often described as the ‘Other’ due to difference in sex. He writes, “Mans desire is the desire of the Other” (1973: 235), which can be interpreted as desire for recognition from the ‘Other’ – in this case Swinton – alternatively it could be desire for what the Other desires, what the Other lacks – in this case Franklin. In the first case, when a child receives care from the Other, this indicates the Other cares for them and understands them. However as Eva is unable to care for Kevin, the rift between them grows and a lack of understanding stunts their relationship growth. Eva is conflicted in her dislike of Kevin for altering her life, and her desire for him to be societies ideal child. In his earlier work, Ecrits, Lacan writes that desire is essentially a demand for recognition (1966: 431), and that the dependence on the Other for recognition is what structures the drives of the child. (1966: 343). Kevin as a child could be seen as playing up in order to hold Eva’s attention, which is understandable when taking her flat affect into account, and when he doesn’t receive this, his desperation for recognition leads him to act out.
In Julia, it can be interpreted that Julia desires recognition through her promiscuity – a desire for attention and intimacy from men – highlighting her loneliness. She has no ‘Other’ to demand attention from, which could be why she became an alcoholic. This is curbed when she puts herself in charge of Tom, she has responsibility, and her drinking reduces. Neither Eva nor Julia were warned about the effects caring for a child has on you as a person. Against their will, there is a transgression in the character of the female protagonist’s– in early scenes, Eva dances in the rain with Franklin, lies in tomato juice in a crowded festival, enjoys sexual intercourse, yet when Kevin is born, Eva loses the capacity to enjoy anything at all.

To conclude, by comparing and contrasting the affective presence/absence of the mother in Kevin and Julia, I have argued that the ‘maternal’ can only exist within discourse. Swinton has challenged the idea of ‘motherhood’ in these two films through her affective absence. The flat affect makes the ‘maternal figure’ the effect of motherhood rather than the origin, as seen through extending Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity. Swinton disturbs the conventions of femininity by her androgynous appearance in Kevin, and her over-feminine appearance in Julia, with clothes that accentuate her cleavage. Through this, she also challenges the idea of the mother, as she is supposed to be the ultimate woman – a provider of life. The idea of the ‘maternal’ has been shown to be a set of acts which comes into being through repetitive performance, or in the case of these two films, does not come into being if not performed at all. Instead there is an absence of maternity. In Julia, this is shown through the scene when she buys him food and gives him water, where she performs maternal tasks, even though she isn’t Tom’s mother, or even a mother at all. These tasks do not appear natural to her, so one can only assume she performs them because she has seen someone else do this. Likewise in Kevin, Eva consults a doctor because she has a lack of confidence with what her own parenting skills, and suggests Kevin has autism so as to free her from blame. Ultimately, both films epitomise the sense that neither presence/absence can dictate a woman’s maternal nature, in that conforming to society’s expectations of motherhood will not guarantee a successful mother/child relationship.
Through her use of flat affect in Kevin, Swinton manages to disconnect with the expected warmth and love that a woman is stereotypically expected to express towards their new born. This could be used to explore post-natal depression. Swinton’s performance in Julia contrasts mightily with this, being one of Swinton’s most extroverted roles. As a woman who shows no desire to be a mother, having the idea of her having ‘family troubles’ scoffed at by her boss, Julia takes on the maternal role reticently.

Bibliography

Bray, Catherine (2011). ‘We Need to Talk About Kevin’ in Film4. Published online: http://www.film4.com/reviews/2011/we-need-to-talk-about-kevin Accessed: 11.01.2015

Brooks, Peter (1976) The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama and the Mode of Excess. Yale University Press: New Haven

Butler, Judith (1993). ‘Imitation and Gender Insubordination’ in The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. Routledge: New York

Cochrane, Kira (2011) ‘Tilda Swinton: I didn’t speak for five years’ in the guardian. Published Online: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/oct/11/tilda-swinton-we-need-kevin Accessed: 11.01.2015

Deleuze, Gilles and Guttari, Félix. (1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism & Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. The Athlone Press: London

Freud, Sigmund (1899) The Interpretation of Dreams. (1953 ed. Translated by James Stachey) George Allen & Unwin Ltd: London

Kaplan, E. Ann (1992) Motherhood and Representation: The mother in Popular Culture and Melodrama. Routledge: London

Lacan, Jacques (1973). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis. (2004 ed.) Karnac Books: London

Lacan, Jacques (1966). Ecrits: The Complete Edition in English (2006 ed.) W.W Norton: London

Lee, Nathan. (2009). ‘Review: Julia’ in Film Comment. Published online: http://www.filmcomment.com/article/review-julia-erick-zonca Accessed: 30.12.2014

Romney, Jonathan (2008). ‘Tilda Swinton: I am not interested in acting skills” in The Independent. Published online: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/tilda-swinton-im-not-interested-in-acting-skills-1038275.html Accessed 20.12.2014

Stern, Daniel N. and Bruschweiler-Stern, Nadia. (1998) “The Birth of the Mother: How the Motherhood Experience Changes You Forever”. Basic Books: USA

Tomkins, Silvan. (1995) “Exploring Affect: The Selected writings of Silvan S. Tomkins” Ed. Virginia E. Demos. Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge: New York

Welburn, Vivienne. (1980) Postnatal Depression. Manchester University Press: Manchester

Filmography

We Need To Talk About Kevin (2011)
Director: Lynn Ramsey
Producer: Christopher Figg, Jennifer Fox
Starring: Tilda Swinton, Ezra Miller

Julia (2008)
Director: Erick Zonka
Producer: Jeremy Burdek, Bertrand Faivre
Starring: Tilda Swinton, Saul Rubinek